Data-Driven Usability Assessment:
Using Multiple Forms of Online Feedback to Improve E-Learning Design
Melissa E. Pierson
Department of Curriculum and Instruction,
Sara G. McNeil
Department of Curriculum and Instruction,
Bernard R. Robin
Department of Curriculum and Instruction,
Abstract: Data drives educational decisions that allow
instructors to immediately respond to learner needs. This paper will
demonstrate how the use of online tools, both transparent and user-initiated,
can yield data to guide not only the maintenance of learning sites, but also
the customization of e-learning environments to more precisely meet the site
use and learning needs of learners. Focus will be on introducing data
collecting tools and models; strategies for analyzing data and implementing
data-driven changes exemplified through case studies, and implications of data
for designing and maintaining e-learning environments.
The days of placing course materials online and crossing our fingers in the hope that the online learner’s needs will be met are over. Online educational environments should be considered live spaces that can and should be responsive to the needs of each particular learning audience.
Data drives educational decisions that allow instructors to immediately respond to learner needs. Whereas instructors in a face-to-face learning context often have the added advantage of quizzical looks and informal questions that can signal a need for redirected instruction, effectiveness of online course design is often not known until students are formally assessed. In fact, e-learners might be quite adept at hiding misconceptions or struggles given the increased amount of time they have to hunt around a website looking for the right information or to post contributions in an asynchronous environment. An instructor might never know the extent to which their online learning aides are meaningful or counter-intuitive, or even how often students attempt to access those materials.
Online course designers can use feedback to improve teaching by monitoring student progress, controlling the pace of learning, and evaluating teaching strategies (Hazari & Schno, 1999). Both user-initiated and more behind-the-scenes feedback allows the instructor to modify e-learning materials on an ongoing basis. Armed with this type of data, faculty are continuously able to monitor students' learning throughout the e-learning experience.
The collection of data from website users can aide “usability engineering,” which attempts to create more usable Web sites by putting the users’ needs at the forefront (Instone, 1997). Understanding what e-learners need and intend to accomplish is becoming of primary concern to e-learning designers and instructors. Ongoing data-driven needs assessment can benefit both formal educational websites such as course web pages in higher education to more informal online learning tools, such as community learning sites. These strategies are also of use for both materials created with course creation tools and custom user-developed websites.
This paper will demonstrate how the use of online tools, both transparent and user-initiated, can yield data to guide not only the maintenance of learning sites, but also the customization of e-learning environments to more precisely meet the site use and learning needs of learners. Specifically addressed will be the use of web-use statistics software that operates behind the scenes to collect site use feedback virtually unbeknownst to students, and online forms and comment fields that allow site creators to interact with students directly, soliciting the feedback that students choose to share. Conference session attendees will specifically
· be introduced to data collecting tools and models;
· learn strategies for analyzing data and implementing data-driven changes, as exemplified through through case studies; and
· engage in a discussion of other forms of feedback and how those formats might be used to enhance the e-learning experience.
Web-use statistical software, or log analyzers, can be a powerful data collection tool for e-learning developers and instructors. The strongest, most completely sound instructional design might be proven useless if the learning materials and structure do not match changes with student needs. Examples of types of data that can be collected in one of these statistical tools, LiveStats, along with ways strategies for data analysis and implementation are listed below:
· Download: A hit or request for an element considered to be a downloadable file. Online courses frequently offer downloadable documents for students to use or print. Time must be taken to ensure consistent, accessible formatting. Awareness of how often documents of this type are accessed will give instructors an idea of how vital they are to students.
· Hit: A hit is any request made on the web server. This includes page views, requests for images and requests for downloadable files. Total site hits can provide overall usage data to support the case for additional course materials or can give an indication of pages that are being overlooked.
· Page View Errors: A hit or request for an element considered to be a page element that was not successful. Knowing that certain elements of an instructional site are not functioning properly can give instructors valuable information so that corrections can be made even before students attempt to access the material.
·
Visit:
A group of transactions between an IP
address and the web server. Details on the actual visits to the site can be
important indicators of student interaction with site materials. This type of
data can answer, for example, the question of when students access the site. If
most students are working from home at
· Time Spent: Number of seconds between the first and last request of a visit. The time a user spends on a site can be an indication of how long it takes to access and read material.
· Visitor: Someone who has initiated a 'Visit' on the web site. Instructors can see who, in fact, is using the course materials. Depending on the intent and purpose of the e-learning environment, it is possible that such data can lead to decisions about protecting course elements from non-students or making other materials available in alternate formats or languages.
· Browser Tag and Operating System: Two commands that identify when a web browser makes a request, the type of browser and operating system the user is using. Online course developers make assumptions about the hardware and software that users have. The usability of a site depends greatly on how compatible the information is with an individual user’s computer set-up. If it appears that a great number of users have a browser or operating system that are less or more functional than initially determined, modifications in material format can be made.
· Viewed Once: If a page is the only page viewed in a visit, it is a 'Viewed Once' page. Depending on the intent of an e-learning site, it is likely that developers and instructors expect students to access more than one page. If pages are viewed once, it may be that the viewers are non-students, and thus the site may be too easy to access for non-students.
Case 1: The Grandeur of Viceregal

Figure 1: The Grandeur of
Viceregal
The Grandeur of Viceregal Mexico, Treasures from the Museo
Franz Mayer website was a collaborative effort between the
The following usage
data for the site were collected using two different versions of the program, LiveStats. The collected data show the number of web
visitors that viewed the Grandeur site and their patterns of use for the period
that the exhibition was on display at the museum.
Total Number of Visits/Time Spent Viewing Site
During the
exhibition time period,, there were 18,804 unique user sessions, or visits to the Grandeur of Viceregal
Mexico web site. The smallest number of visits occurred on a Sunday,
with 49 visits, and the largest number of visits occurred on a Wednesday, with
602 visits. On average the smallest number of visits occurred on a Saturdays
with 209.44 visits. On average the largest number of visits occurred on a Mondays
with 314.28 visits.
32,634 pages from
the Grandeur site were viewed during this period, and the average time
spent per visitor during the selected range was 1 minute and 57 seconds.
Most Commonly Viewed Pages
As one might expect,
the main introductory page (default.hm) was the most commonly accessed page of
the Grandeur of Viceregal Mexico web site. As shown in Table 1, the data showed
that other frequently accessed pages included the cultural exchange,
exhibition, and lesson plan pages.
|
Top
10 most commonly accessed pages during period: |
||||
|
/default.htm (main
intro page) |
with |
2482 |
page views |
(7.65% of all traffic) |
|
/exchange/visit_2.cfm |
with |
1302 |
page views |
(4.01% of all traffic) |
|
/exhibition.html
|
with |
736 |
page views |
(2.27% of all traffic) |
|
/resources/lessonplans.htm
|
with |
730 |
page views |
(2.25% of all traffic) |
|
/exchange/exhibit.cfm |
with |
725 |
page views |
(2.23% of all traffic) |
|
/exchange/meet.cfm
|
with |
595 |
page views |
(1.83% of all traffic) |
|
/comparison.html
|
with |
437 |
page views |
(1.35% of all traffic) |
|
/timeline/1500s.html |
with |
434 |
page views |
(1.34% of all traffic) |
|
/resources.html
|
with |
417 |
page views |
(1.28% of all traffic) |
|
/exhibition/cultures.html |
with |
411 |
page views |
(1.27% of all traffic) |
Table 1: Most Commonly Accessed Pages
Where Visitors Came
From
Table 2 shows that visitors to the Grandeur web site came
from across the globe. The majority of Web visitors were from
|
Breakdown of Traffic by Continent |
|||
|
|
with |
15120 sessions. |
(80.93 % of traffic) |
|
|
with |
149 sessions. |
(0.80 % of traffic) |
|
|
with |
955 sessions. |
(5.11 % of traffic) |
|
|
with |
329 sessions. |
(1.76 % of traffic) |
|
|
with |
208 sessions. |
(1.11 % of traffic) |
|
|
with |
28 sessions. |
(0.15 % of traffic) |
Table 2: Breakdown of Visitors Worldwide
Search Engines
Information about how visitors to the Grandeur web site used search engines also provides some insight into how web visitors search for information online. An overview of search terms that visitors entered using the popular search engine, Google, is shown in Table 3. Of interest to educators is that the two most frequent search terms were “lessons,” and “plans.”
|
lesson |
231 |
|
plans |
224 |
|
of |
214 |
|
the |
136 |
|
art |
125 |
|
writing |
121 |
|
furniture |
118 |
|
ceramic |
100 |
|
pots |
90 |
|
and |
88 |
|
desk |
88 |
|
franz |
78 |
|
in |
77 |
|
timeline |
73 |
|
|
71 |
|
mayer |
68 |
|
museo |
60 |
|
virgin |
58 |
|
for |
57 |
|
to |
47 |
|
on |
42 |
|
a |
41 |
|
hogg |
41 |
|
folding |
40 |
|
Hogg |
39 |
|
screen |
38 |
|
Franz |
37 |
|
Mayer |
36 |
|
1800s |
36 |
|
church |
35 |
|
indian |
35 |
|
Ima |
33 |
|
greek |
33 |
|
|
|
|
lady |
33 |
|
ima |
33 |
|
printable |
33 |
|
|
|
|
guadalupe |
31 |
|
coconut |
31 |
|
|
30 |
|
Lesson |
30 |
|
guadelupe |
30 |
|
activities |
30 |
|
picture |
29 |
|
portable |
28 |
|
de |
28 |
|
spice |
28 |
|
container |
28 |
|
century |
28 |
|
spanish |
27 |
|
Virgin |
27 |
|
mexican |
27 |
|
ceramics |
26 |
|
Museo |
26 |
|
rubric |
24 |
|
portrait |
24 |
|
games |
23 |
|
cultural |
23 |
|
styles |
23 |
|
how |
22 |
|
design |
22 |
|
The |
21 |
|
hundreds |
21 |
|
architecture |
21 |
|
archangel |
20 |
|
vase |
20 |
|
Plans |
20 |
|
desks |
20 |
|
wardrobe |
20 |
|
colonies |
19 |
|
teachers |
18 |
|
patterns |
18 |
|
map |
18 |
|
kids |
18 |
|
islamic |
18 |
|
shell |
18 |
|
painting |
18 |
|
wood |
18 |
|
18th |
18 |
|
european |
17 |
|
pattern |
17 |
|
make |
16 |
|
Guadalupe |
16 |
|
|
16 |
|
lecturn |
16 |
|
Art |
16 |
|
6 |
16 |
|
designs |
16 |
|
large |
15 |
|
with |
15 |
|
portraits |
15 |
|
museum |
15 |
|
chinese |
15 |
|
historical |
15 |
|
|
|
|
history |
15 |
|
plan |
14 |
|
bayou |
14 |
|
marquetry |
14 |
|
Guadelupe |
14 |
Table 3: Most Common Search
Terms Entered by Google Users
One of the more interesting trends revealed by the usage
data from the Grandeur of Viceregal Mexico web site is the number of visits
that occurred after the exhibition ended its run at the MFAH in August, 2002.
As illustrated in Table 4, the web site attracted more visits during the last
five months of 2002 and the first part of 2003 after the exhibition ended, than
it did while the exhibition was on display. One theory is that educators are
accessing the online materials during the school year; we will continue to
follow the site’s usage to see if this pattern continues.

Table 4: Total
Number of Web Visitors
For the Gilder Lehrman website, we began using a web stats program early in
the development process to gather user data and provide a more useful
navigation system. As the site grew larger and richer with materials, it was
imperative to understand where users were entering the site and provide a
structure that would allow them to navigate from any page. It was also
essential to convey to the users the volume of information available – a fact
that was not apparent on the interior pages of the site. It became clear from
the web stats data that many users were entering the site from a search engine
and going directly to the pages that displayed information from a database. We added a link that simply said, “Interested in more
history? click here”
(Figure 2) to encourage users to visit
the main page of the web site. We believe that this has resulted in an increase
of both page views and the length of time spent on the site – both facts that
are gathered through the web stats program.
Interestingly enough, Digital History, a site
that was developed from the Gilder Lehrman website, solved some of the
navigation issues, encouraging users to explore deeper into the site’s
resources by using a fairly lengthy menu on the left side of every page (http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu).
Link to front page of the site
![]()

Figure 2: Link that encourages users to explore more of the site.
The stats also give us a clear pattern of usage over an extended period of time. So if our audience is primarily education/schools, then we can verify that usage by seeing that pattern emerge - especially in matching usage stats to typical school calendars. Table 5 is the graph of usage from Gilder Lehrman that depicts the pattern that has emerged after the site was established. Usage of the site increases during the school year and drops during holidays and vacations. In terms of planning, we try to revise the site and do maintenance of the server during these lower periods of activity when there are not so many users logging in. We try to have the site polished and ready by the start of each academic semester.
Further, the stats give us an idea of the grade level of users; we are seeing more K-12 schools accessing the sites. This has led us to design and develop more materials for this audience rather than exclusively for higher education.

Table 5: Gilder Lehrman usage graph.
User-initiated feedback is solicited by providing ways for users to express their thoughts or perspectives in a variety of closed survey-type items and open-ended questions. One simply way to encourage user-initiated feedback is to place mailtos and feedback buttons on every page, so that learners can note any problems or questions as they work (Instone, 1997). HTML Forms can be used to collect student feedback to provide the instructor immediate feedback on the effectiveness of course material, style of teaching, and the progress of students so that appropriate course changes can be made (Hazari & Schno, 1999). Most web users are familiar with the check boxes, radio buttons, drop-down lists, and input boxes of online forms. The information that the user enters is sent directly to the course instructor via an e-mail message and can also be stored in a database for future use and analysis. In these ways, online forms provide non-threatening ways for students to communicate their concerns to course instructors in a manner that makes it appear as though feedback is necessary and welcome.
In both the Digital History website and the Gilder Lehrman website, we collect user comments through an online comments form. The comments are automatically emailed to the designer of the sites as well as placed into a database for further study. Comments range from simple questions about history to more complex and intriguing controversies. In some cases we have provided supplementary materials in response to these comments or questions, and in one case, the person who provided comments actually wrote an article for the site. This data has been enormously helpful in the redesign of the Gilder Lehrman site and in the development of the new Digital History site. In addition to the comment itself, we give users the option to provide a small amount of demographic data such as how they found the site and how valuable did they find the historical information and teaching materials. The link to the comments form is at the bottom of every page so it is easy for visitors to the site to access and use. (Figure 3)

Figure 3: Comments form in Digital History
There is another technique that we
use in both history sites that has proven to be an effective way of monitoring
user interest and providing additional interaction with the subject matter
expert for the sites. The “Ask the Hyperhistorian” feature has been one of the
most popular features of the sites. Users may enter an historical question in a
comments form that is emailed to the subject matter expert, one of the
developers of the site. In addition, the question is added to the database. The
expert may then access the administrative pages for the site, login, reply to
the question, and select whether the question may be displayed for the general
public. (Figures 4 and 5)
|
Figure 4:
Interface for “Ask the Hyperhistorian” |
Figure 4:
Interface for the question and answer display for the “Ask the Hyperhistorian”
feature |
Our experience with using statistical tools to log the use of our online courses has shown us that the design, implementation, and ongoing maintenance of e-learning materials cannot be accomplished successfully without real attention to data. The implications of recognizing the power that such data places in our hands as instructors are clear; the collection and analysis of both transparent and user-initiated feedback from the beginning is a vital part of our instructional efforts.
A case in point involves an undergraduate “Technology in the Classroom” course that we will be re-envisioning as an online course. As the very first act of our planning process, our staff drafted a series of open-ended questions that were posed to the students in the prerequisite course, as well as to students currently taking the face-to-face version of the course slated to be redesigned. We sought answers to the following questions: